LSAT Practice Test 2026 - Free LSAT Practice Questions and Study Guide

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

1 / 575

What is the outcome of the "unless" rule as described?

It inverts the meaning of the preceding part

The "unless" rule functions by inverting the meaning of the preceding part of the statement. In other words, when "unless" is used, the intention is to indicate that the statement following "unless" will occur if the condition outlined in the initial part is not met. This is why option A is the correct answer.

Options B, C, and D are incorrect because the "unless" rule does not combine the meanings of the parts, negate the entire statement, or reinforce the main intention. Instead, it specifically flips the meaning of the preceding part to convey a conditional relationship between two parts of the statement.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

It combines the meanings of the parts

It negates the entire statement

It reinforces the main intention

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy