LSAT Practice Test 2025 - Free LSAT Practice Questions and Study Guide

Question: 1 / 575

Which conclusion can be drawn from the statement "Raimundo appears in every photograph that Yakira does not appear in"?

Not Y implies R

The correct conclusion that can be drawn from the statement "Raimundo appears in every photograph that Yakira does not appear in" is "Not Y implies R" (Choice A). This means that if Yakira does not appear in a photograph, then Raimundo will definitely appear in that same photograph. This conclusion logically follows from the given statement because Raimundo only appears in photographs where Yakira is not present. This relationship is accurately captured by Choice A.

Choices B, C, and D do not accurately reflect the relationship described in the statement. Choice B states "Not R implies Y," which is the opposite of the correct conclusion. Choices C and D, "R implies not Y" and "Y implies not R" respectively, do not align with the original statement that specifies Raimundo appears in photographs where Yakira is not present. Therefore, they are not the correct conclusions to draw from the given statement.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Not R implies Y

R implies not Y

Y implies not R

Next Question

Report this question

Download LSAT Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy